Question for Anti-Illegal Immigration Activists

Radley Balko asks a great question of anti-illegal immigration activists: "If you’re adamant that you only oppose illegal immigration, then do you also support vastly expanding the number of legal visas the federal government grants to low-wage, low-skill workers (which at the moment is an exceedingly small number)?"

I've been asking anti-illegal immigration people that same question.

Booker Rising recently highlighted one of my quotes on immigration.

"As people often point out to me, I'm almost always in the minority when the issue is illegal immigration. 1) I oppose punishing private employers for hiring illegals. 2) I support taking laws against such hiring practices off the books. 3) I don't oppose laws preventing the various levels of governments from hiring illegals. 4) If the various levels of government are serious about punishing illegals, then they should prevent them from receiving government services or benefits. 5) It isn't the government's job to protect you against competition for jobs, products, spouses, etc. 6) There is no right to have a community of a certain demographic makeup. If you want your neighborhood or community to stay predominately black or predominately white, then buy up the property around you. Perhaps you need racial covenants on the houses near your home? 7) Of course, there need to be safety and health checks. To steal a line I heard from a friend: You're welcome, but don't forget to sign the guest book.

We can't count on closing the border as a way to keep competition out. There was a time that people said, 'When in Rome, do as the Romans do.' But now, we must consider, 'Rome has come to you.' Wherever you are, people are trying to sell stuff to you, buy stuff from you if you have something worth selling, trying to hire you if you have skills they want, or competing with you. If you're going to run a race, you can't train based on potential competitors being kept away from the starting or finishing line. We can't be sure what wave of people or technology is coming along, and should stop acting as if we have people in government smart enough to figure out which people should be let into the country."


1 comment:

LonewackoDotCom said...

A comment I left on the Balko thread:

Unfortunately, this time I have to agree with Radley Balko: there’s no reason not to massively increase legal immigration and/or “guests”.

Of course, like Radley, I’m completely ignorant of all the many steps the MexicanGovernment takes to obtain PoliticalPower inside the U.S.

And, like Radley, I have no problem with giving a foreign government PoliticalPower inside the U.S. and basically giving them some degree of control over our policies. “One world, one people!” as Radley would say.

And, like Radley, I haven’t seen this latest example of what the MexicanGovernment really thinks: youtube.com/watch?v=lSBZxCbbz7k (that’s a spokesman for the MexicanConsulate in SD saying that SD will be Mexico once again).

And, like Radley, I haven’t read this summary of the actions of the MexicanGovernment: city-journal.org/html/15_4_mexico.html

For instance, like Radley, I have no problem with a foreign government giving “free” textbooks to students in U.S. schools that teach that foreign government’s viewpoint. “One world, etc.” as Radley would say.

If you’d like to know much, much more than Radley does, scroll through my archives.